Yetkinlik nedir pdf

Log in with Facebook Log in with Google. Remember me on this computer. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free PDF. Meryem Yilmaz Soylu.

A short summary of this paper. Educators must teach young people relevant information and skills not only to give them a chance to explore and understand the world around them, but also to familiarize them with digital technologies.

However, before we can educate young people, we must empower teachers using digital technology because teachers who use digital technologies appropriately are not only good role models, but also instrumental in helping students develop positive attitudes towards such technologies. In this study, descriptive methods were used to determine current levels, and it was found that teachers exhibit average levels of digital enpowerment.

When examining sub-categories, it was discovered that their awareness and motivation levels are higher than average; however, technical access and empowerment levels remain average. A gender male and female comparison suggests that while both groups score highly on awareness and technical access, males and females are roughly average in terms of motivation, empowerment and other overall indicators. Social science, Turkish and language teachers score highly on awareness and motivation, but average on technical access, empowerment and other overall indicators.

Information literacy standarts for student learning. Chicago, American Library Association. Achuonye, K. Contemporary educational technology. Port Harcourt: Pearl Publishers. Akkoyun F. Gestalt terapi. Akkoyunlu, B. Commission of the European Communities. A memorandum on lifelong learning. Brussels: SEC. Dijk, J. A Framework for digital divide research. Hague, C. Digital participation, digital literacy,and school subjects. A review of the policies, literature and evidence.

Harvey, L. Makinen, M. Digital empowerment as a process for enhancing citizens' participation, E-Learning, 3 3 , By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies.

To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. To browse Academia. Log in with Facebook Log in with Google. Remember me on this computer. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free PDF. Hasan Bozgeyikli. A short summary of this paper.

Scale was developed according to social cognitive career and self-efficacy theory. Scale is composed of 27 items. It is a Likert type scale and has three sub scales. The scale was applied on primary school 8th year students for validity and reliability analysis. Construct validity of the scale was determined by factor analysis. Item-total correlation, Alfa correlation and the scale score stability were computed for reliability analysis. Findings about reliability and validity of the scale indicated that careerdecision making self efficacy scale was a valid and reliable instrument.

Tablo 4. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychology Review, 84, Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 35, Betz, N. Journal of Counselling Psychology. A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students:Math and science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, — Hackett, G.